Dunn v. Shinseki
Gayle Dunn |
Eric K. Shinseki |
1:2010cv02754 |
November 10, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Philip A. Brimmer |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER granting 31 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment shall enter in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. The trial preparation conference scheduled for 7/27/12 and the trial scheduled to commence on 8/16/2012 are vacated. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/31/12.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 54 ORDER SETTING CASE FOR TRIAL. Five-day Jury Trial set for 8/6/2012 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Trial Preparation Conference set for 7/27/2012 at 10:00 AM before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/24/12. (mnfsl, ) |
Filing 44 ORDER. Plaintiff's 43 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion and Motion to Continue Final Pretrail [sic] Confernce [sic] is denied to the extent it seeks an extension of time to respond to defendant's summary judgment motion. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/4/12. (mnfsl, ) |
Filing 42 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Plaintiff's Combined Rule 37(a)(3)(B) Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Motion to Re-Open Discovery for the Limited Purpose of Completing Discovery. Defendant shall respond to the Second Set of Requests for Production by 1/16/2012. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/29/2011. (mehcd) |
Filing 40 ORDER. Plaintiff's 36 Renewed Motion to Stay Deadline to File Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Pending Resolution of Discovery Issues is denied. The deadline for plaintiff to file a response to defendant's motion for summary judgment is extended until Wednesday, 1/4/2012. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/21/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 35 ORDER denying 33 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Deadline to File Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Pending Resolution of Discovery Issues. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/20/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 27 MINUTE ORDER granting 25 Defendant's Request [Motion] to Withdraw Motion to Compel. 23 Defendant's Motion to Compel is withdrawn. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/21/2011. (mehcd) |
Filing 22 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/16/2011. (mehcd) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER granting 16 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference currently scheduled for 8/2/2011 is hereby vacated. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/26/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dunn v. Shinseki | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gayle Dunn | |
Represented By: | Joseph Anthony Salazar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Eric K. Shinseki | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.