Brown v. Adams County et al
Wesley R. Brown |
Adams County and Adams County Sheriff's Department |
1:2010cv02778 |
November 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Adams |
Boyd N. Boland |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that the complaint, the amended complaint, the second amended complaint, and the action are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as legally frivolous. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for Reconsideration" 19 filed on 2/2/11, is denied as moot, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 2/17/11.(lyg, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER. Order denying 11 Motion for TRO and Hearing for a Preliminary Injunction by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 01/26/11.(jjh, ) |
Filing 15 Minute ORDER granting 14 Motion seeking to change the way his name appears in the courts docketing records. The clerk of the court is directed to change Plaintiffs name in the courts docketing records from Wesley R. Brown, other Wolf Brown, to Wesley R. Brown, a/k/a Wesley R. Wolf Brown by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/14/11.(jjh, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Second Amended Complaint within 30 days. Order denying 7 Ex-Parte Motion for Research Assistance by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/10/11.(jjh, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/18/10. (jjh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.