St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company et al v. North River Insurance Company, The et al
Plaintiff: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, The
Defendant: North River Insurance Company, The and United States Fire Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2010cv02936
Filed: December 3, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 94 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: USFI's Motion for Summary Judgment 77 is DENIED. Travelers' Motion for Summary Judgment 78 is GRANTED IN PART, insofar as Travelers (and its associated entities) is entitled to summary judgment on USFI's claim for contribution or indemnification relating to its payment of the attorney's fee award assessed against Pinkard and in favor of AJM and Schroeder, and DENIED IN PART in all other respects. Valley Forge's Motion for Summary Judgment 79 and Continental's Motion for Summary Judgment 80 are DENIED. Counsel shall jointly contact chambers as soon as practicable to schedule a Pretrial Conference and shall proceed with preparation of a Proposed Pretrial Order in accordance with Docket #50. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/26/12.(msksec, )
October 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 10/4/2011. Granting in part and denying in part 71 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. Dispositive Motions due by 12/2/2011. (FTR: Robin Mason and Emily Seamon) (romsl)
April 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MINUTE ORDER granting 57 Motion of Karen W. Howard to Withdraw as Co-Counsel for Third-Party Defendants Valley Forge Insurance Company and Continental Casualty Company. Karen W. Howard is terminated, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 4/21/11.(lsw, )
April 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MINUTE ORDER granting 53 Motion of Eileen N. Miller to Withdraw as Co-Counsel. Eileen N. Miller is terminated, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 04/18/2011.(wjc, )
March 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/29/11. (msksec, )
March 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MINUTE ORDER granting 38 The North River Insurance Company and United States Fire Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Their Amended Third-Party Complaint. The instant motion is GRANTED, and that the Amended Third- Party Complaint (doc # 38 -1) is accepted for filing as of the date of this order, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 03/02/2011.(wjc, )
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER resetting the Scheduling Conference to 3/29/2011 at 8:30 a.m., pursuant to a telephonic request made by counsel for Plaintiffs, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/14/11. (cbssec)
January 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/25/11. (mskcd)
December 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 3/2/2011 at 9:15 a.m. A Proposed Scheduling Order, as well as Confidential Settlement Statements, are due no later than 5:00 p.m. on 2/23/11, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 12/9/10. (cbssec)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company et al v. North River Insurance Company, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Represented By: Marilyn Sue Sterrenberg-Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, The
Represented By: Marilyn Sue Sterrenberg-Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North River Insurance Company, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Fire Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?