Homewatch International, Inc. v. Pacific Home Care Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Homewatch International, Inc.
Defendant: Pacific Home Care Services, Inc. and Garagin Vertanessian
Case Number: 1:2010cv03045
Filed: December 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Kristen L. Mix
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER. Defendants Motion To Dismiss or in the Alternative Transfer Venueto the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California 11 filed 2/4/2011, is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to transfer this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/18/2011.(sah, )
May 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER. Defendants Motion To Dismiss or in the Alternative Transfer Venueto the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California 11 , filed 2/4/2011, is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, and ruling DEFERRED IN PART. Defendants SHALL FILE a supplemental brief and evidence in support of their motion to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) only by no later than 5/23/2011. The deadlines for the filing of plaintiffs response and any reply SHALL BE as provided by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/2/2011.(sah, )
March 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Trial Preparation Conference set for 2/24/2012 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn.Three (3) day Bench Trial set for 2/27/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/24/11. (rebsec, )
January 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. The Answer 9 is STRICKEN. The Court extends Defendants deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 2/4/2011. To this end, Defendant Vertanessian may file an Answer on his own behalf; however, he must comply with the Local Rules of this Court. Defendant Pacific Home Care Services, Inc. must respond to the Complaint through counsel. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/11/2011. (sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Homewatch International, Inc. v. Pacific Home Care Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Homewatch International, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Cowman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Home Care Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garagin Vertanessian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?