Sierra v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
Martha Sierra |
Stonebridge Life Insurance Company |
1:2010cv03123 |
December 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Jefferson |
Walker D. Miller |
Kathleen M. Tafoya |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 118 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The 117 Joint Stipulation and Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice is granted. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a), this matter, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. The trial set for 10/22/2013 at 8:30 AM is vacated. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/11/13.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 111 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Stonebridge's Motion for Summary Judgment. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/23/13.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 104 ORDER SETTING CASE FOR TRIAL. Four-day Jury Trial set for 10/22/2013 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Trial Preparation Conference set for 9/20/2013 at 10:00 AM before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/17/13. (mnfsl, ) |
Filing 50 MINUTE ORDER granting 45 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Dispositive Motions due by 7/16/2012. Discovery due by 6/15/2012 for the sole purpose of allowing the parties to depose the expert(s) regarding the authenticity of the audio recordings. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 9/17/2012 at 09:45 AM before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 9/10/2012. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/2/12.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 40 MINUTE ORDER granting 38 Defendant's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/17/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 33 STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/15/11. (mnf, ) |
Filing 29 MINUTE ORDER. The Motion for Entry of Stipulated Confidentiality Order 27 is DENIED without prejudice, and the proposed Stipulated Confidentiality Order is REFUSED. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/9/2011.(sah, ) |
Filing 21 AMENDED ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 3/2/2011 at 09:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/7/11. (mnf, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 3/17/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/3/11. (mnf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sierra v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Stonebridge Life Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | James E. Gigax |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Martha Sierra | |
Represented By: | Ronnie Fischer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.