Park v. TD Ameritrade Trust Company Inc. et al
Lori L. Park |
TD Ameritrade Trust Company Inc., TD Ameritrade Online Holdings Corp., TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation, Toronto-Dominion Bank, The, Joseph H. Moglia and J. Thomas Bradley, Jr. |
1:2010cv03136 |
December 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Zita L. Weinshienk |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER denying Second 16 Motion for Reconsideration. by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/13/11.(lygsl, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER denying 13 Motion for Reconsideration. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the Court file a copy of this Order in Park v. TD Ameritrade Trust Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-cv-02599-PAB-KMT, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/30/11.(lyg, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice as duplicative of Lori L. Park v. TD Ameritrade Trust Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-cv-02599-PAB-KMT. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the Court file a copy of this Order in Park v. TD Ameritrade Trust Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-cv-02599-PAB-KMT, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 3/17/11. (lyg, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/05/11. (jjh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.