Winston v. Brown et al
| Maxine Winston |
| Sandra (I) Brown, Sandra Brown, U.S. Department of Treasury- Internal Revenue Service, Wakefield & Associates, Inc., 56th Avenue Construction Company, Inc., K&H Construction Company, Inc. and U.S. Bank N.A. |
| 1:2010cv03170 |
| December 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| William J. Martinez |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2410 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 61 the Parties Unopposed Motion for Entry of Decree Quieting Title. It is ADJUDGED and DECREED that Maxine Winston, Plaintiff, at the time of the commencement of this proceeding, was, and is now, the owner in fee simple absolute, with right to possession of the Property by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/4/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 57 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Party Sandra Brown and Sandra (I) Brown With Prejudice. by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/31/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 54 Stipulation and Joint Motion for Dismissal, It is further ORDERED that the United States is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 and 41(a)(2), each party to bear her or its own costs and attorneys fees. by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/27/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
50
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: A Motion Hearing was held on 5/10/2011. ORDERED: The Unopposed Motion for Publication, doc # 47 is GRANTED. The Unopposed Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, doc # 45 is DENIED. THE CLERK'S OFFICE IS DIRECTED TO ENTER A DEFAULT against Defendants Wakefield & Associates and U.S. Bank, N.A. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (FTR: Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 27 Motion to Dismiss Parties Party Colorado Department of Revenue and State of Colorado are Dismissed. The affected parties shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs. by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/25/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
33
MINUTE ORDER granting 31 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Amend Verified Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that U.S. Bank, N.A, successor in interest to Central Bank of Denver, shall be substituted as a party Defendant in place of US Bancorp, successor in interest to Central Bank of Denver by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 3/8/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER The parties are directed to confer and to file a Joint Status Report due by 2/28/2011. by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/18/2011. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 3/22/2011 at 9:15 a.m. A Proposed Scheduling Order, as well as Confidential Settlement Statements, are due no later than 5:00 p.m. on 3/15/11, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 1/11/11. (cbssec)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/5/11. (mskcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
