Hankins v. Hankins et al
| Terence J. Hankins |
| Stacy Razzano, (I) Simon, Simon, Axis Steel, Inc., Elizabeth Oldman, Helen (I) M. Hankins, Walter VanEtta, Tim Jantz, Walter (I) VanEtta, Tim (I) Jantz, Stacy (I) Razzano, Elizabeth (I) Oldman, Helen M. Hankins, John (I) V. Corra, John V. Corra, Aristedes (I) Zavaras and Aristedes Zavaras |
| 1:2010cv03172 |
| December 30, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that the second amended complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions 15 16 17 are denied as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/13/11.(lyg, )
|
Filing
12
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Second Amended Complaint within 30 days from the date of this Order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/5/11. (lsw, )
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. FURTHER ORDERED that 8 "Motion #3: Request for Full Copy of Trial Transcript, Case 07 CR 159" and 9 "Request for Court to Provide all Required Notices and Summons to Defendants to Obtain Their Jurisdiction. This is Motion #4 of This Case" are denied as premature, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/8/11.(lyg, )
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/06/11. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.