Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. QBE Corporate Ltd. et al
Qwest Communications International, Inc. |
QBE Corporate Ltd, Catlin Syndicate Limited, Ace Capital IV Limited, Ace Capital Ltd, Ace Capital V Limited and Hardy Underwriting Limited |
1:2011cv00157 |
January 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Richard P. Matsch |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER Granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment will enter for the defendants, dismissing this civil action and awarding costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/4/2011.(rpmcd ) |
Filing 37 ORDER Granting 36 Motion to Clarify re 24 , (see Order for details), by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/28/2011.(rpmcd) |
Filing 25 Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Scheduling Conference held on 5/10/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Amended Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, filed May 9, 2011 23 , is granted and Amended Answer [23-1] is accepted as filed. Scheduling Order signed. (FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd) |
Filing 17 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 4/20/2011 at 10:30 AM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on April 14, 2011, And DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TOCOMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.4, defendants shall file disclosure statements, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/23/2011. (rpmcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.