Brown v. Bureau of Prisons et al
| Joe Brown |
| Bureau of Prisons, F.C.I. Englewood, Hendricks and Shortner |
| 1:2011cv00200 |
| January 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 93 Motion for Default Judgment Order, construed by the Court as a motion for entry of default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to promptly arrange with the United States Marshal the service of the Second Amended Complaint (docket #89) upon the named individual Defendants in this case. If appropriate, the Marshal shall first attempt to obtain a waiver of service of these documents pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/31/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER. The 65 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is accepted in part. Defendants' 49 motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part and, to the extent the Court converted the motion into a motion for summary judgment , is granted. Summary judgment shall enter in favor of defendants and against plaintiff on plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief pursuant to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act against defendants in their official capacities. All of the r emaining claims in the operative complaint are dismissed. Within 30 days of entry of this order, plaintiff may file an amended complaint asserting an equal protection claim against the proper defendants. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/14/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER. Defendants' 49 motion to dismiss, to the extent it seeks dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, is converted into a motion for summary judgment. On or before Friday, 8/31/2012, plaintiff may address whether defendants are entitled to summary judgment due to a failure by plaintiff to fully exhaust administrative remedies. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/9/12. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING re: 49 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. On or before 2/1/2012, Plaintiff and Defendants shall each file a supplemental brief, no longer than five pages, addressing only the issues identified in this order. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/18/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER denying without prejudice 53 Motion for Order. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/30/11.(cmacd ) Modified on 12/1/2011 to change filed date(cmacd ).
|
|
Filing
51
MINUTE ORDER granting 43 Plaintiff's Motion to Ask for Leave to Amend Complaint in Accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. The tendered Second Amended Complaint, found at 47 is accepted as filed. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 49 by 11/23/2011. Defendants may file a reply in support of the motion within 14 days after the response is filed. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/3/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Defendant's Motion to Strike Amended Complaint. The Court orders that Plaintiff's 33 tendered amended complaint is stricken. However, the Court will allow the Plaintiff to file a motion seeking leave to amend his complaint, and attach to the motion a proposed Amended Complaint that is signed and in compliance with all federal and local rules, on or before 10/14/2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/29/11.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
32
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Scheduling Conference held on 8/8/2011. Plaintiff shall file a Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint by 9/15/2011. 26 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is withdrawn. (FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/5/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Process Receipt and Return, # 2 Process Receipt and Return)(sah, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 5/4/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/23/11. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
