Becker v. Dish Network, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Judith M. Becker
Defendant: Dish Network, L.L.C.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00253
Filed: January 31, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING REFILED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED (1) The Defendant's Refiled Motion for Attorneys' Fees 23 is GRANTED. The Defendant is awarded $5378.91 in fees. Said sum will be paid in 30 days failing which judgment shall enter in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff in said amount. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/14/11.(msksec, )
October 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) or, In the Alternative, Motion to Stay is GRANTED IN PART, DENI ED IN PART, AND DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. Specifically, Defendant's motion is granted to the extent it seeks to stay the proceedings pending arbitration. The parties shall proceed to arbitrate the claims in this case in accordance with the Arbitration Agreement. Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 3, the case is STAYED in all respects pending arbitration, and for administrative purposes, the Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Defendant's request that the case be dismissed is de nied. Defendants request for attorney's fees is denied without prejudice to refiling with an appropriate affidavit; such request, however, must be filed within 10 days of the issuance of this Order, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/05/2011.(wjc, )
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 5/6/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/14/2011. (mjwcd)
February 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/7/11. (mskcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Becker v. Dish Network, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Judith M. Becker
Represented By: Hannah Bell Ross
Represented By: Mark Joseph Berumen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dish Network, L.L.C.
Represented By: Laurie J. Rust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?