Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. Heckel et al
Capitol Indemnity Corporation |
Larry Heckel, Heckel Construction, LLC and Harvest Gold Village Homeowners Association, Inc. |
1:2011cv00340 |
February 9, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Christine M. Arguello |
Craig B. Shaffer |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay his or its own costs and attorneys fees. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/11/2011. (ervsl, ) |
Filing 22 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. A Motion Hearing was held on 3/30/2011. ORDERED: Harvest Gold Village Homeowners Association, Inc. Joinder in Heckel Defendants Second Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, doc # 19 , is DENIED. Answer due on or before APRIL 8, 2011. Heckel Defendants Motion to Stay Action, doc # 8 , is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Scheduling Conference currently set for April 25, 2011 at 9:15 a.m. is VACATED. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (FTR: Linda Kahoe) (cbscd) |
Filing 6 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 4/25/2011 at 09:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/24/11. (mnf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.