Adams v. Soyka et al
| Lawrence Adams |
| Town of Green Mountain Falls and David Soyka |
| 1:2011cv00399 |
| February 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Lewis T. Babcock |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER: Pursuant to the 51 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice, this matter shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own fees and costs, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/31/2012. (eseam)
|
|
Filing
44
MINUTE ORDER granting 42 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Extend Deadline for Submission of Final Pretrial Order. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 3/28/2012 by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 03/28/12.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER. The Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Defendant Town of Green Mountain Falls 40 is GRANTED. This matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant Town of Green Mountain Falls Only, each party to pay their own fees and costs. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/5/2012.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTE ORDER granting 34 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference set for 10/28/2011 is vacated. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/20/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/19/2011. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
