Trask et al v. Bank of Choice et al
| David S. Trask, Suzanne S. Trask, Mandy M. Rasmussen, Daniel C. Donegon, Beverli J. Donegon, Dennis Campbell, Roxanne Campbell, Allison Anne Mason and First American Title Insurance Company |
| Bank of Choice, NFBOC Note, LLC, FirsTier Bank, NorthFlats, LLC and Deborah A. Morgan |
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| 1:2011cv00516 |
| March 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Larimer |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Other Contract |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The 71 Unopposed Motion for Dismissal of Action is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant NFBOC Note, LLC shall be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. All remaining claims against remaining Defendants shall be dismissed WITHO UT PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear his, her or its own costs and attorney fees. The Notice of Lis Pendens recorded by Plaintiffs at Reception No. 20090082308 of the records of the Larimer County Clerk and Recorder on 12/07/2009, shall be released. The Clerk shall close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 04/25/2012.(wjcsl, )
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER. The 9 Motion to Substitute FDIC as Receiver for Defendant FirsTier Bank and Request for 90 Day Stay of Proceedings Under 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(12) is GRANTED for those reasons as outlined in this motion. The FDIC is substituted as Recei ver for Defendant FirsTier Bank pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c) and 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(12) and is the real party in interest. The caption of this case shall be amended consistent with this Order. The 49 Defendant FDIC-R's Motion for St ay of Proceedings Pending Administrative Claims Review Process and 55 NFBOC's Joinder in Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Administrative Claims Review Process are GRANTED consistent with 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(5)(A)(I). See Order for details. This case is STAYED for 180 days from 05/04/2011 the date that Plaintiff First American filed its administrative claim, or upon denial or allowance of Plaintiff First American's administrative claim by the FDIC-R, whichever occurs firs t. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set on 05/25/2011 at 1:30 PM is VACATED. Joint status report due by 06/01/2011. 48 Defendant FDIC-R and NFBOC Note LLC's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to the Amended Complaint, to Submit Rule 26 Disclosures and to Vacate/Reset the May 25th Scheduling Conference is GRANTED for the reasons stated in the body of this Order and for good cause shown, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 05/23/2011.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 5/25/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/1/2011. (mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/17/11. (mskcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
