Carnation Building Services, Inc. v. City and County of Denver et al
Plaintiff: Carnation Building Services, Inc.
Defendant: April Henderson, Service Employees International Union Local 105, Kim Day, Ruth Rodriquez, City and County of Denver and Department of Aviation
Case Number: 1:2011cv00703
Filed: March 21, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Christine M. Arguello
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER denying as moot 73 Motion to Dismiss. This action is remanded to the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/16/12.(dkals, )
September 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 74 Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/7/2012. (mehcd)
August 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER of Dismissal of Defendant Service Employees International Union Local 105: all claims against this defendant are dismissed with prejudice, with each such party to pay its own costs and fees. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 8/21/12. (dkals, )
March 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER Affirming 3/2/2012 Order of United States Magistrate Judge re 62 Report and Recommendations; granting in part 51 Motion for Attorney Fees. Denver Defendants are AWARDED $3,000.00 in attorneys' fees for the dismissal of Kim Day and Ruth Rodriguez. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/27/2012.(jjpsl, )
March 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT granting 56 Amended Motion for Leave. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11-703.(jjpsl, )
February 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 53 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/1/2012. (mehcd)
December 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER granting 38 Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/29/11.(mnfsl, ) Modified on 12/30/2011 to correct filed date and signature date(mnfsl, ).
August 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MINUTE ORDER granting 43 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for a Stay of All Proceedings, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/9/2011. (mehcd)
May 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MINUTE ORDER granting 32 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Vacate [and Reschedule] Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference reset for 6/28/2011 09:15 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/13/2011. (mehcd)
March 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Court ORDER denying Defendant Service Employee International Union Local 105's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, signed by Denver County District Court Judge Sheila A. Rappaport on 3/9/11. (lyg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carnation Building Services, Inc. v. City and County of Denver et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: April Henderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Service Employees International Union Local 105
Represented By: Stanley Miller Gosch
Represented By: Richard Rosenblatt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kim Day
Represented By: Kevin Allen Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruth Rodriquez
Represented By: Kevin Allen Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City and County of Denver
Represented By: Kevin Allen Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Aviation
Represented By: Kevin Allen Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carnation Building Services, Inc.
Represented By: James C. Ruger
Represented By: James Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?