Vigil v. Pueblo School District No. 60
Plaintiff: Linda Vigil
Defendant: Pueblo School District No. 60
Case Number: 1:2011cv00834
Filed: March 31, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Pueblo
Presiding Judge: Christine M. Arguello
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re: 84 Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice. This case and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant School District are dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay her or its own attorney fees and costs, as agreed between the parties. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/18/12. (mnfsl, )
May 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER : Dismissal Paper due by 5/15/2012. Motion Hearing set for 5/17/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Status Conference set for 5/17/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. The final pretrial conference set for May 17, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., is VACATED, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/1/12. (bnbcd, )
April 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER: denying 33 the defendants Motion to Compel Disclosures of Non-Privileged Notes, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/16/12.(bnbcd, )
March 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MINUTE ORDER denying 54 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for the Plaintiff Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR83.3D. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/15/2012.(jjpsl, )
February 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER : granting 42 Motion to Amend. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the Amended Complaint and Jury Demand [Doc. # 42-5]. The dispositive motion deadline is extended to and including March 5, 2012, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/13/12.(bnbcd, )
November 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER: re: 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Expert Report filed by Linda Vigil. The Motion is granted. The case schedule is modified to the following extent: The parties shall designate all experts on or before November 21, 2011 The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts on or before December 20, 2011, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/3/11. (bnbcd, )
October 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 PROTECTIVE ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/26/11. (bnbcd, )
April 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 6/28/2011 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/18/11. (bnbcd, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vigil v. Pueblo School District No. 60
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Vigil
Represented By: Charles F. Kaiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pueblo School District No. 60
Represented By: Sonja S. McKenzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?