Anderson v. Hartley et al
| Anthony Anderson |
| Steve Hartley and John Suthers |
| 1:2011cv00931 |
| April 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Crowley |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER. The habeas corpus application 1 is denied, and the action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear his own costs and attorney fees. That leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. No certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/3/2012. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER. The Combined Motion [for] Reconsideration for Counsel, Sanctions for late filing of brief [and] extension of time to file 22 submitted by Applicant, Anthony Anderson, on 8/15/2011, is denied. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/16/2011.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/22/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response within 21 days from the date of this Order. Applicant may file a Reply within 21 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/14/11. (lsw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
