Bleil v. Williams Production RMT Company, LLC, et al
| Robert W. Bleil |
| Williams Production RMT Company, LLC and The Williams Companies, Inc. Severance Pay Plan |
| 1:2011cv00997 |
| April 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Mesa |
| Lewis T. Babcock |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
FINAL JUDGMENT re: 74 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, by Clerk on 12/13/12. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER granting 76 Joint Motion to Vacate Trial and Strike Deadlines. The forthcoming trial preparation conference and trial are vacated, and the impending attendant deadlines are stricken. The Summary Judgment Order is modified to reflect the pa rties' stipulation that Plaintiff was paid in full for the 863 RSUs in question. Granting 55 Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment should be entered for Defendants and Defendants shall be awarded their costs, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/11/2012. (eseam)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED that the Severance Plan is dismissed from the case, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/30/12.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER. The matter is set for Pretrial Conference before the U.S. Magistrate Judge in Grand Junction on 10/25/2012 at 10:00 a.m. Discovery cutoff: 7/30/2012 Dispositive motion deadline: 8/15/2012. A proposed pretrial order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the Court by no later than 10/18/2012. Pretrial Conference set for 6/7/2012 at 2:30 p.m. is VACATED. By Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice on 5/23/2012. (sahsl, )
|
|
Filing
46
INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/2/2012. (eseam)
|
|
Filing
45
MINUTE ORDER granting 44 Joint Motion for Entry of Inadvertent Disclosure Agreement. The tendered Inadvertent Disclosure Agreement is accepted for filing, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/1/2012. (eseam)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Regarding 41 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice on 4/4/12.(lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER. The parties Joint Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify Scheduling Order 38 is GRANTED. Discovery due by 5/15/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 6/15/2012. Settlement Conference set for 5/16/2012 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice. By Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice on 2/28/2012.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER. The matter is set before me for a Pretrial Conference on 6/7/2012 at 10:30 a.m. I now set this matter for a Telephonic Status Conference on 2/7/2012 at 1:00 p.m. Counsel shall coordinate to create a conference call among themselves before contacting the court at 970.241.2187 at the scheduled time. By Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice on 1/10/2012. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. By Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice on 12/12/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 8/29/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/13/11. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
10
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Amend Complaint 8 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file his Amended Complaint. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/9/2011.(sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
