Spence v. Cabiling
| Paul W. Spence |
| Louis Cabiling |
| 1:2011cv01027 |
| April 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Crowley |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER Affirming and Adopting 2/21/2012 Order of United States Magistrate Judge re 46 Report and Recommendations; granting 32 Motion to Dismiss Amended Prisoner Complaint. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/27/2012.(jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 33 Defendants Motion to Stay Discovery. Discovery is temporarily stayed pending resolution of Defendants Motion to Dismiss. The parties shall file a status report within three business days of receiving a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, indicating what changes in the Scheduling Order are needed. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/24/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 19 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, denying without prejudice 22 Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery, and denying as moot 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a); if he chooses to do so, Defendant may re-file his motion to dismiss and/or motion to stay discovery, both of which will pertain to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/15/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Defendant's Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for 9/15/2011 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty IS CONVERTED TO A STATUS CONFERENCE. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/14/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Granting Service by United States Marshal. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/29/11. (mnf, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw in Part. The Complaint and claims asserted against Defendant Cabiling, seeking proper medical treatment and money damages, will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. The Complaint and claims asse rted against Defendant Louis Cabiling shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. Defendants CCA and Aristedes Zavaras are dismissed from the action, and the Clerk of the Court is instructed to remove them as named parties to the action. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 6/17/2011. (sah2, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Spence v. Cabiling | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul W. Spence | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Louis Cabiling | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
