Precision Concrete Cutting, Inc. v. Concrete Sidewalk Solutions, Inc. et al
| Precision Concrete Cutting, Inc. |
| J. Scott Laudenslauger and Concrete Sidewalk Solutions, Inc. |
| J. Scott Laudenslauger and Concrete Sidewalk Solutions, Inc. |
| Precision Concrete Cutting, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv01123 |
| April 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 94 Defendants' Motion to Unseal the Settlement Agreement to allow the Defendants to file a copy of the Settlement Agreement; denying 95 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay. The Court grants in part D efendants' Motion to Unseal the Settlement Agreement to allow the Defendants to file a copy of the Settlement Agreement redacting the amount of payment, which is to remain confidential consistent with this Order. They may file the redacted versi on of the agreement, terming it "Redacted Copy of Exhibit A to Docket 76 , Defendants' Motion to Enforce the Settlement Agreement." As the copy of the Material Terms of Settlement Agreement currently on file (Docket # 76 , Exhibit A) is unredacted, it will remain sealed. The Court further denies in part Defendants' motion to the extent Defendants seek an award of attorney's fees, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/28/2012.(wjc, ) Modified on 3/1/2012 to correct the filed date (wjc, ).
|
|
Filing
91
MINUTE ORDER granting 89 Joint Motion for Order for Administrative Closure. Pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 41.2, the Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close the case subject to reopening for good cause, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/20/2011.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 74 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss All Plead Claims and Counterclaims Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and the Parties' Settlement Agreement By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/29/11. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all of defendants' claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.(jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
65
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/28/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
63
MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Defendants' request in the Stipulated Motion for Adoption of Protective Order 61 , Defendants' Motion for the Adoption of the Protective Order from Suit One 57 is withdrawn. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/26/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER SETTING A HEARING UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 16. A hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 is set for 9/13/2011 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/13/11. (mnf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
