Broemmel v. Lappin
Michael Broemmel |
Harley G. Lappin |
1:2011cv01177 |
May 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Fremont |
Boyd N. Boland |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER. Motions for Preliminary Injunction, 44 45 46 47 and 48 and his Motion to Reconsider Judgment 49 are DENIED by Judge John L. Kane on 04/11/12. by Judge John L. Kane on 04/11/12.(jjhsl, ) |
Filing 41 ORDER. Petitioner has failed to establish that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or the laws of the United States. Accordingly, he is not entitled to relief under 18 U.S.C. § 2241 and his Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief 26 is DENIED by Judge John L. Kane on 03/23/12.(jjhsl, ) |
Filing 36 MINUTE ORDER granting 32 Motion for Leave to File Reply up to and including 03/26/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 02/29/2012.(wjc, ) |
Filing 29 ORDER re: 26 Brief of Applicant in Support of Writ of Habeas Corpus shall be treated as an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The government shall file a response to the amended petition no later than February 24, 2012. by Judge John L. Kane on 1/25/2012. (ervsl, ) |
Filing 20 ORDER ASSIGNING CASE. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1C.11, and the express instructions of Senior Judge John L. Kane, the case will be assigned to Senior Judge John L. Kane. This case shall be assigned to Senior Judge John L. Kane. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/15/2011. (sah, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER to File Supplement to Preliminary Response, within 14 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/27/11. (lyg, ) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER denying as unnecessary 11 Motion to Expedite Application for Writ; denying as premature 12 Motion to Transfer Case, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/1/11.(lsw, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER to File Preliminary Response within 21 days from the date of this Order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/7/11. (lsw, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies within 30 days from the date of this order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/9/11. (lsw, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER. ORDERED that Mr. Broemmel's Motion to Quash Detainer, filed on 4/26/11, is construed liberally as asserting claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to open a separate action pursua nt to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and to direct Mr. Broemmel to cure any deficiencies in the § 2241 action. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall place a copy of Mr. Broemmel's Motion to Quash Detainer in the newly created, separate action, by Judge John L. Kane on 5/2/11. (lyg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Broemmel v. Lappin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael Broemmel | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Harley G. Lappin | |
Represented By: | William George Pharo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.