Harris, Jr. et al v. City and County of Denver et al
| Leroy Harris, Jr. and Denver Lincoln Limousine, Inc. |
| Department of Excise and License, Denver Police Department, W. Baisden, W. (I) Baisden and City and County of Denver |
| 1:2011cv01201 |
| May 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER granting 45 Defendant W. Baisden's Motion for Protective Order to Stay or Limit Discovery Pending Resolution of His Motion for Summary Judgment. All discovery related to Plaintiff's remaining claim against Defendant Baisden is STAYED pending resolution of the 44 motion for summary judgment, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 03/06/2012.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS. Defendants' 25 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. All claims remain pending against Defe ndant John Doe. The Plaintiffs shall have 45 days to identify and serve such Defendant and amend the caption of the action, failing which all claims against Defendant John Doe shall be DISMISSED. Claim One by Mr. Harris is DISMISSED against Denver bu t, remains pending against Officer Baisden to the extent that it alleges a violation of Mr. Harris' Fourth Amendment rights. To the extent it is alleges violation of Fourteenth Amendment rights it is DISMISSED. Claims Two and Three are DISMISSE D as to Officer Baisden and Denver. Claim Four is DISMISSED against Officer Baisden, but remains pending as to Denver. Because dismissal is based on insufficient factual allegations in the First Amended Complaint, the claims are dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a motion to amend as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 should the Plaintiffs discover additional facts sufficient to support the claims, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 01/30/2012.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Their Motion to Dismiss. All discovery is stayed pending resolution of the 25 motion to dismiss with the exception of discovery related to Plaintiff's claims seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from Defendant City and County of Denver, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 08/25/2011.(wjc, ) Modified on 8/25/2011 to correct spacing (wjc, ).
|
|
Filing
38
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/15/11. (msksec, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/10/11. (mskcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
