Borwick v. University of Denver, Board of Trustees of the et al
| Carolyn Jean Gissendanner Borwick |
| University of Denver, Board of Trustees of the, University of Denver Graduate School of Social Work, Robert Coombe, Gregg (I) Kvistad, Gregg Kvistad, James (I) R. Moran, James R. Moran, Barbara (I) Wilcots, Barbara Wilcots, Walter (I) LaMendola, Walter LaMendola, James (I) Herbert Williams, James Herbert Williams, William (I) Cloud and William Cloud |
| 1:2011cv01216 |
| May 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
Opinion and ORDER denying Motion for Reconsideration and granting in part Motion to Review Taxation of Costs. Ms. Borwick's Motion to Alter Judgment (# 84 ) is DENIED. Ms. Borwick's Motion for Costs Review (# 90 ) is GRANTED IN PART, inso far as the Court VACATES that portion of the Clerk's taxation of costs that awarded the Defendants the costs of transcribing the depositions of Dr. Shogan, Dr. Wilk, and Mr. Evenson (for a total of $ 1,137.95), and DENIED IN PART, insofar a s the Court AFFIRMS the award of costs to the Defendants inall other amounts taxed by the Clerk. Ms. Borwicks Motion to Stay Enforcement of the Clerk's Cost Award (# 91 ) is PROVISONALLY GRANTED, in that upon Ms. Borwick posting a supersedeas b ond in the amount of all remaining costs taxed by the Clerk, and this Court's approval of such bond, the Court will stay the effect of its taxation of costs pending the outcome of Ms. Borwick's appeal. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/24/2013.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
80
OPINION AND ORDER granting 58 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 71 Motion to Strike. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/18/13.(mjgsl, )
|
|
Filing
35
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/9/11. (msksec, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER Settlement Conference set for 1/17/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/8/2011. (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 22 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendants in Individual Capacity and Amend Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1). The clerk of court shall file Plaintiff's Second Amended Verified Complaint and Jury Demand (Doc. No. 22 -2), by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 09/01/2011.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
18
AMENDED ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 9/8/2011 09:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/15/11. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 8/3/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 05/11/2011. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/10/11. (mskcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
