Prudential Insurance Company of America, The v. Guddendorf et al
| Prudential Insurance Company of America, The |
| Kirk Guddendorf, Toni Guddendorf, Carol J. Merrit and George E. Guddendorf |
| 1:2011cv01307 |
| May 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER of Judgment. ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Prudential pay the amount of the death benefit on the Policies of $16,000.00 to Toni Guddendorf plus claim interest. The within matter be, and the same hereby is, dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear her, his, or its own attorney fees and costs, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 11/2/11.(lsw, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER: the parties shall file a motion or motions that resolve this matter and that seek dismissal of this action with prejudice. Dismissal Paper due by 10/26/2011, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/26/11. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
23
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 15 Defendant Toni Guddendorf's Motion to Dismiss. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/9/11.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 8/16/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/2/11. (bnbcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
