Kemp et al v. Lawyer et al
| Keith (I) Kemp, Keith Kemp and Connie Kemp |
| Ivan Lawyer, Kirk Firko, Chad Dunlap and Ralph C. Turano |
| 1:2011cv01368 |
| May 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Lewis T. Babcock |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Ivan Lawyer served on 5/25/2011, answer due 6/15/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service on Defendant Ivan Lawyer)(Karlsgodt, Paul) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nathan Andrew Schacht on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Schacht, Nathan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Rebecca Teitelbaum Wallace on behalf of Connie Kemp, Keith Kemp, Keith (I) Kemp (Wallace, Rebecca) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Mark Silverstein on behalf of Connie Kemp, Keith Kemp, Keith (I) Kemp (Silverstein, Mark) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Paul Stephen Enockson on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Enockson, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Chad Dunlap, Kirk Firko, Ivan Lawyer, Ralph C. Turano ( Filing fee $ 350, Receipt Number 38122) Summons Issued, filed by Keith (I) Kemp, Connie Kemp, Keith Kemp. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Receipt)(bjrsl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
