American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Apartment Builders, LP et al
| American Family Mutual Insurance Company |
| Roessner & Roessner, Inc and Apartment Builders, LP |
| 1:2011cv01380 |
| May 24, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of American Family Mutual Insurance Company against Roessner & Roessner, Inc re: 82 Order on Motion for Default Judgment. by Clerk on 11/12/2013. (trlee, )
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting 81 Motion for Default Judgment. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 11/4/2013.(trlee, )
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER granting 79 Joint Motion for Dismissal of Claims Brought by and between American Family Mutual Insurance Company and Apartment Buliders, LP with Prejudice. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 08/26/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE: This matter has been scheduled for a five-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on August 12, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. A Trial Preparation Conference is set for July 24, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 03/21/2013. (rbjsec. )
|
|
Filing
55
MINUTE ORDER denying 54 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. On November 6, 2012 the Court directed counsel jointly to contact Chambers and set a trial and trial preparation conference to occur no later than September 2013. See Docket # 52 . Couns el have not complied. The Court is not willing to entertain your requests for scheduling modifications until you comply with the Court's requests. Also, with respect to defendant's motion to exclude the expert opinions of Steven A. Norwo od # 53 , defendant represents that the parties agreed to rely on the expert testimony and reports introduced in the underlying arbitration. Id. at 3-4. If so, then the Court wants plaintiff either to withdraw the expert or provide a very compell ing explanation as to why it has chosen not to abide the agreement. If there was no such agreement, then the Court will want to hear from the defendants as to why they inserted that in their brief. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 03/20/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 33 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/29/12. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
32
MINUTE ORDER granting 30 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Summary Judgment Deadlines, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/19/11.(lsw, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER: The Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 22] is DISCHARGED. Scheduling Conference reset for 9/1/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/26/11. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 8/24/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/7/11. (bnbcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
