Jebe v. Clements et al
| Quinn McKenzie Jebe |
| Emily Bond and Tom Clements |
| 1:2011cv01402 |
| May 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MINUTE ORDER granting 18 Motion to Clarify or Correct Information. The Order of 8/23/2011 17 , is corrected to the extent that Respondents are directed to file a Preliminary Response within 21 days from the 8/15/2011, Order 12 , by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/2/11.(lsw, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER. The Court will disregard the document titled "Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241" 16 . Respondents are directed to continue to respond to the order to file a preliminary response 12 within 30 days from the date of the 8/15/2011 order, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 8/23/11. (lsw, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER to File Preliminary Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/15/11. (lsw, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Directing Applicant to File Amended Application within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/1/11. (lsw, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency as set forth in the Order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/1/11. (gmssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
