Tradebank International Franchising Corporation et al v. Community Connect, LLC et al
Tradebank International, Inc. and Tradebank International Franchising Corporation |
Community Connect, LLC, William Riggs and Annette Riggs |
1:2011cv01530 |
June 13, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Richard P. Matsch |
Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 115 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE re 114 : this civil action and all claims asserted are dismissed with prejudice, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/15/2014. (jsmit) |
Filing 110 ORDER Setting Jury Trial for 10/6/2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/28/2014. (jsmit, ) |
Filing 104 ORDER Vacating 103 August 4, 2014, trial date, and setting a Pretrial Conference for 7/28/2014 at 10:30 AM in Conference Room, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 7/24/2014 in paper form directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m., and lead counsel present in person, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/8/2014. (jsmit) |
Filing 103 ORDER Setting Jury Trial for 8/4/2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/26/2014. (jsmit) |
Filing 95 ORDER re 94 : defendants' are granting additional time, to and including February 13th, 2014, to obtain new legal counsel, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/15/2014. (rpmcd ) |
Filing 92 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAWAL AND 30 DAYS FOR DEFENDANTS TO OBTAIN NEW COUNSEL OR TO FILE A STATUS REPORT re 90 and 91 : Mr. Goodman is relieved of any further responsibilities in this matter. defendants have to and including January 13, 20 14 to obtain new counsel and inform the Court by the filing of an entry of appearance or a status report explaining their efforts to obtain counsel (Entry of Appearance or Status Report due by 1/13/2014), by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/13/2013. (Attorney Gregory A. Goodman NEF not terminated until ruling on 83 Motion). (rpmcd) |
Filing 82 ORDER On Pending Motions : Defendants' motion for leave to conduct limited third-party discovery 77 is denied. Plaintiffs' motions for contempt and sanctions 78 is denied with respect to their requests for orders striking the Defendants' remaining pleadings and for the entry of judgment. The Plaintiffs' alternative request for attorney's fees may be renewed after the trial on the merits, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/8/2013.(rpmcd) |
Filing 75 ORDER Setting Jury Trial for 12/16/2013 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/23/2013. (rpmcd) |
Filing 71 ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS : defendants' motion for reconsideration [#60] is denied; defendants' motion for protective order to quash notice of deposition [#61] is denied; defendants' motion for dismissal of plaintiffs' second,fifth , sixth and seventh claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 2(b)(6) [#64] is denied, and the defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41 [#65] is denied. A trial date and a second trial preparation conference will be set after determining the schedules of counsel, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/25/2013.(rpmcd) |
Filing 58 Courtroom Minutes for Trial Preparation Conference held on 2/25/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Harold Rice 36 , is granted. Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Unrelated L awsuits 37 , is granted. Motion in Limine Regarding Alleged Statements of Farmer Franchisees 38 , is granted. Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Alleged Unenforceability of Franchise Agreement 39 , is granted. Motion in Limine Regar ding Use Of In Judicio Admissions By Gregory Goodman 40 , is granted. Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendants Second, Fourth and Fifth Counterclaims 41 , is granted. Trial scheduled March 18, 2013 is vacated. A pretrial conference will be set upon submission of a proposed pretrial order. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd) |
Filing 34 ORDER Setting Jury Trial for 3/18/2013 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A and Trial Preparation Conference for 2/1/2013 at 02:00 PM in Conference Room, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/18/2012. (rpmcd ) |
Filing 32 ORDER Setting Pretrial Conference for 9/18/2012 at 10:30 AM in Conference Room, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4:00 p.m. 9/13/2012, lead counsel present in person and no parties or representatives of parties permitted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/1/2012. (rpmcd) |
Filing 28 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 1/31/2012 02:00 PM in Conference Room before Judge Richard P. Matsch. The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on 01/26/12 by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/27/11. (jjh, ) |
Filing 27 ORDER re 23 ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS. Ruling on the Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions will not be made until there has been an adjudication of the merits of this civil action and an opportunity for an evidentiary hearing after an adjudication, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/23/2011.(rpmcd ) |
Filing 13 ORDER Denying 12 Motion for Leave and 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and Counterclaims, until August 29, 2011, is Granted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/16/2011.(rpmcd) |
Filing 10 Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 8/2/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: ORDERED: Motion to Postpone or Stay Hearing on Pending Motion to Dismiss, filed 8/1/2011 9 , is moot, hearing held. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, filed 7/18/2011 6 , is denied. (FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.