Entek GRB, LLC v. Stull Ranches, LLC
| Entek GRB, LLC |
| Stull Ranches, LLC |
| Stull Ranches, LLC |
| Entek GRB, LLC |
| 1:2011cv01557 |
| June 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
240
ORDER. ORDERED that Stull Ranches' Motion to Review Clerks Taxing of Costs (Doc. 233 ) [Docket No. 234 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff Entek GRB, LLC is awarded costs in the amount of $32,964.55. Signed by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 09/12/16.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
212
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/1/15. ORDERED that the March 29, 2013 Final Judgment 174 is VACATED. It is further ORDERED that Entek's Motion for Summary Judgment 149 is GRANTED as to Count Three, DENIED as moot with respect to Count One and Count Two, and DENIED with respect to Entek's claim for injunctive relief. It is further ORDERED that Stull's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 146 , Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Join the United States, a Required Party 192 , and Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Satisfy Conditions Precedent 193 are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in favor of Entek in accordance with the terms of this Order.(kpreu)
|
|
Filing
174
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk, re: 173 Order. By Clerk on 3/29/13. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER denying 88 Motion to Dismiss Entek's First Amended Complaint. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/27/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
167
ORDER granting 87 Entek GRB LLC's Motion to Dismiss Stull Ranches, LLC's Third Amended Counterclaim CM/ECF Docket No. 61. Stull Ranches, LLCs 61 Amended Third Counterclaim is dismissed without prejudice. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/28/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
155
MINUTE ORDER. The Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/20/2012 is vacated. The Court will reset the Final Pretrial Conference, if necessary, after resolutions of the 146 , 149 motions for summary judgment. Defendant Stull Ranches 153 Request to Appear by Telephone for Final Pretrial Conference is denied as moot. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/14/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER denying 126 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/7/12.(pabsec)
|
|
Filing
150
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Motion Hearing held on 8/1/2012. Order taking under advisement 126 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Court Reporter: Janet Coppock. (pabcd)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER denying 116 Defendant's Motion to Strike "Rebuttal" Expert Report of Alan Rabinoff. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/10/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
112
MINUTE ORDER granting 110 Joint Motion for Limited Changes to Interrogatory & RFP Deadline [CM/ECF 42 9f-g]. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/2/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
109
MINUTE ORDER granting 107 Third Joint Motion to Modify Certain Scheduling Order Deadlines. Discovery due by 5/11/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 6/11/2012. Affirmative Expert Designations/Disclosures due 3/26/2012. Rebuttal Expert Designations/Disclosures 4/26/2012. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/16/2012.(jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER granting in part and denying as moot in part 34 Motion to Dismiss, ORDERED that Stull Ranches, LLC's First Amended Counterclaim is herebydismissed. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/6/2012.(jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
105
MINUTE ORDER granting 103 Second Joint Motion to Modify Certain Scheduling Order Deadlines [CM/ECF 42]. Discovery due by 5/2/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 6/1/2012. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/10/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
99
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/19/2011. (klmcd, )
|
|
Filing
95
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 83 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/9/11.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER granting 72 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (CM-ECF Docket No. 18). The Clerk of the Court shall accept Plaintiff's 72 -1 Verified First Amended Complaint and accompanying Exhibits [Docket Nos. 73-77] for filing. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Verified First Amended Complaint on or before 10/21/2011. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/7/11.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
66
MINUTE ORDER granting 64 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Reset Deadline Set in CM-ECF Docket No. 42. The Court accepts Plaintiff's representation that it is not seeking a stay of discovery. The deadline for the filing of a motion for protective order is reset as seven business days after the date when Plaintiff is served with Defendant's initial written discovery requests. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/29/11.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
60
MINUTE ORDER granting 55 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Amended Third Counterclaim. The Clerk of Court shall enter the Amended Third Counterclaim located at Docket No. 55 -1, which amends pages 6-7 of the Amended Counterclaims entered at Docket No. 25 , effective as of the date of this Minute Order. Plaintiff shall answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Third Counterclaim on or before 10/11/2011. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/26/11.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
54
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 45 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Motion Hearing held on 9/19/2011. (Court Reporter: Janet Coppock) (pabcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
