R.E. Monks Construction Co., LLC v. Telluride Regional Airport Authority
| R.E. Monks Construction Co., LLC |
| Telluride Regional Airport Authority |
| 1:2011cv01658 |
| June 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| William J. Martinez |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 the Stipulated Motion to Stay Deadlines in order to Allow Parties to Finalize Settlement. Response to Motion to Dismiss due by 12/14/2012. Plaintiff's responses to discovery requests due by 12/21/2012. Reply in support of Motion to Dismiss 12/28/2012. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/14/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
54
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 52 the Stipulated Motion for Clarification of the Court's August 24, 2012 Order. Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss due by 11/14/2012. Defendant's reply in support of the motion to dismiss due by 11/28/2012. Plaintiff's responses to Defendant's written discovery due by 11/23/2012. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/10/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
51
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 the Stipulated Motion to Stay Proceedings and Extend Discovery Pending Outcome of Conditional Settlement Agreement. Initial expert disclosures due by 10/24/2012. Rebuttal expert disclosures due by 11/20/2012. Discovery due by 12/21/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 1/28/2013. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/19/2013 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/24/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
44
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 the Stipulated Motion to Stay Proceedings adn Extend Discovery Deadlines to Allow Parties to Mediate. Initial expert disclosures due by 8/24/2012. Rebuttal expert disclosures due by 9/24/2012. Discovery due by 10/24/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 11/26/2012. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 1/18/2013 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/29/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER Denying 6 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Denying as moot 34 Defendants Motion to Stay Discovery and Extension of Deadlines, by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/2/2012.(ervsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: R.E. Monks Construction Co., LLC v. Telluride Regional Airport Authority | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: R.E. Monks Construction Co., LLC | |
| Represented By: | Cody Wayne Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Telluride Regional Airport Authority | |
| Represented By: | John H. Steel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
