Rhoden v. Lakewood, City of et al
| Daniel Leroy Rhoden |
| Kevin (I) Paletta, Ryan O'Hayre, Ryan (I) O'Hayre, Stuart Ruybal, Stuart (I) Ruybal, Kevin Paletta and Lakewood, City of |
| 1:2011cv01734 |
| July 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland [Docket No. 82] is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that defendants Ryan O'Hayre and Stuart Ruybal's Motion for Summary Judgment 77 is GRANTED. ORDERED that plaintiff's fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh claims for relief are dismissed without prejudice. ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff. ORDERED that defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 by Clerk on 03/26/14. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. Ordered that Defendants Ryan O'Hayre and Stuart Ruybals Motion for Summary Judgment 77 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's first claim for relief is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh claims for relief are dismissed without prejudice. Ordered that this case is closed by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 03/24/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER: Motion to Withdraw 69 is GRANTED; Motion for Extension 72 is GRANTED. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/7/13. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
66
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/20/13. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 53 Defendants Motion for Clarification of the Courts March 8, 2013 Order (ECF No.51). Defendants the City of Lakewood, Colorado, Kevin Paletta, Ryan O'Hayre and Stuart Ruybal's 36 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No.30) is denied with respect to plaintiff's claim against Officers O'Hayre and Ruybal for extreme and outrageous conduct. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/9/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER. Defendants The City of Lakewood, Colorado, Kevin Paletta,Ryan O'Hayre and Stuart Ruybal's 36 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No.30) is granted with respect to all claims against The City of Lakew ood and Officer Paletta and the claims for abuse of process and malicious prosecution against Officers O'Hayre and Ruybal. The motion to dismiss is denied with respect to the constitutional claims and the claims for false imprisonment, assault and battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Officers O'Hayre and Ruybal. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/8/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
35
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot defendants' 24 Motion to Dismiss. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/29/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: granting 31 The Motion to Amend. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the First Amended Complaint [Doc. # 30]. The Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/21/12.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/12/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies within 30 days from the date of this order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/12/11. (lsw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
