Scotsman Industries, Inc. et al v. Broadbent
Scotsman Industries, Inc. and Mile High Equipment LLC |
John A. Broadbent |
1:2011cv01793 |
July 8, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
John L. Kane |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER Dismissing Action with Prejudice re: 63 Second Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Counterclaims. ORDERED that all claims asserted in Plaintiff's Complaint 1 and in Defendant's Counterclaim 16 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUIDICE, each party to bear his or its own costs and attorney fees, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/10/13.(sgrim) |
Filing 62 ORDER re: 60 Motion to Dismiss. I decline to grant the Motion, because I will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a Settlement Agreement with terms unbeknownst to the Court. The parties are ordered to supplement their Motion to Dismiss by filing the Settlement Agreement. Should the parties wish to preserve the confidentiality of their Settlement Agreement, I grant leave for it to be filed under seal, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/4/13.(sgrim) |
Filing 45 ORDER granting 38 Motion to Compel, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/6/12.(sgrim) |
Filing 36 MINUTE ORDER; 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/8/2012.(klmcd, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.