Ross et al v. John and Jane Does 1-5
| S. Jawn Ross and S. Jawn Ross, PC |
| John and Jane Does 1-5 |
| 1:2011cv01877 |
| July 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Summit |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
OPINION AND ORDER granting 55 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' CFAA claim is DISMISSED without prejudice, and their state-law defamation claim is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. There being no cognizable claims against the only defendants to have been served herein, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. By Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/6/12.(kfinn, )
|
|
Filing
61
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 59 Defendants' Motion to Compel Disclosures and Responses to Discovery Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 37, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/31/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
53
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/30/12. Text Only Entry (msksec, )
|
|
Filing
25
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Status Conference held on 10/13/2011, granting 22 Plaintiffs' Combined Motion to 1) Vacate and Reset Scheduling Conference and 2) Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Subpoenas. Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2011 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Plaintiffs shall be allowed to issue five (5) additional subpoenas. (FTR: C. Coomes -- FTR Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
24
MINUTE ORDER: 22 Plaintiffs' Combined Motion to (1) Vacate and Reset Scheduling Conference and (2) Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Subpoenas is granted in part as to the first request. The Court reserves judgment on the second request. The Scheduling Conference set for 10/13/2011 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty IS CONVERTED TO A STATUS CONFERENCE. Plaintiff shall be prepared to discuss their second request as stated in the motion. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/7/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER 2 Plaintiffs' Motion for Expedited Order Authorizing Discovery is granted. The Court authorizes the issuance of twelve subpoenas, for the purpose of obtaining the identity of the individuals posting allegedly defamatory statements on the internet regarding Plaintiffs. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/9/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
13
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 8/8/2011, granting 2 Plaintiffs' Motion for Expedited Order Authorizing Discovery. (FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/1/11. (mskcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
