Blackman v. Torres
Plaintiff: Robert Blackman
Defendant: Torres
Case Number: 1:2011cv02066
Filed: August 8, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Fremont
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 143 Final JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Torres against Robert Blackman re: 142 Order, by Clerk on 3/12/2014. (klyon, )
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER denying 129 Defendant's Motion to Stay, in Part, October 15, 2013, Order. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/30/13.(bnbcd, )
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER: On or before 10/29/2013, if at all, the plaintiff shall file a Motion toReconsider the District Judge's Order Concerning Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. # 75 ]. The motion shall refer to this order. The plaintiff sh all include in the motion his response to the defendant's motion to dismiss [Doc. # 45 ] and his objections to my recommendation [Doc. # 60 ] on the defendant's motion to dismiss. On or before 10/29/2013, the warden at the United States Prison, Administrative Maximum in Florence, Colorado, or his designee, shall file a proposed remedial plan which addresses all mail processing issues identified in this order. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/15/2013. (klyon, )
August 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER Regarding Custody of Exhibits. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/27/13. (bnbcd, )
August 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER re: 104 Defendant's Notice Regarding Anticipated Hearing Testimony. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/26/13. (bnbcd, )
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER: 95 MOTION to Produce is GRANTED; 100 MOTION to Quash Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum is DENIED. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/20/13. (bnbcd, )
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER: An evidentiary hearing on the issue of the alleged interference withthe plaintiff's mail 82 is set for 8/27/2013, at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Plaintiff and defense counsel shall provide to the court, by 8/20/2013, proposed witness lists, exhibit lists, and the original and two copies of all exhibits. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/25/2013. (klyon, )
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MINUTE ORDER granting 78 Defendant's Motion for Leave to Take Plaintiff's Deposition. The plaintiff's deposition will be taken on or before 7/31/2013, at the Federal Bureau of Prisons, ADX, Florence, Colorado. Defense counsel will coordinate with prison officials. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/10/2013. (klyon, )
March 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER CONCERNING RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 60 respectfully is REJECTED to the extent the magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff' ;s Complaint Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) 45 be denied as to the plaintiff's claim for monetary damages in his First Amendment retaliation claim; the objection 64 filed by the defendant is SUSTAINED to the extent the def endant argues that the plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim must be dismissed; otherwise, the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 60 is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court; otherwise, the objections stated in [ 64] filed by the defendant are OVERRULED; the defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) 45 is DENIED to the extent the plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation claim and s eeks declaratory and injunctive relief under that claim; otherwise, the defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) 45 is GRANTED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/11/13. (kfinn, )
January 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER: United States Attorney shall submit a report re: mail by 2/19/13. United States Attorney shall mail a copy of 60 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, and 64 Objection to Report and Recommendations, to the plaintiff within 24 hours. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of the docket sheet to the plaintiff. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/31/13. (bnbcd, )
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER denying 17 First Motion and denying 27 Second Motion insofar as they request that the court mark its mail as Special Mail, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/11/12.(mjgsl, )
December 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/13/2011. (sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blackman v. Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Blackman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?