Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. Repphun et al
| Unum Life Insurance Company of America |
| Larry Repphun, Teresa Repphun and Christopher Brady Repphun |
| 1:2011cv02123 |
| August 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for 11/7/2011 is vacated. Status Conference set for 12/1/2011 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/1/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/29/11. (mskcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
