Hankins v. Husband et al
Plaintiff: Terence J. Hankins
Defendant: John (I) E. Husband, John E. Husband, Bureau of Land Management and Axis Steel, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011cv02224
Filed: August 24, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Logan
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION AND CLOSING CASE. Magistrate Judge Shaffers Recommendation 63 is ADOPTED. Defendant Husbands Motion to Dismiss 24 is GRANTED. All claims against Defendant Husband are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICEfor lack of jurisdic tion. Defendant Axis Steels Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment 30 is GRANTED. All claims against Defendant Axis Steel are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant Bureau of Land Managements Motion to Dismiss 35 is G RANTED. All claims against Defendant Bureau of Land Management are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close this action. By Judge William J. Martinez on 7/5/2012.(sahsl, )
March 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER Mr. Hankins tendered Amended Complaint, filed February 29, 2012 Doc. # 47 is STRICKEN; Denying as moot 51 Motion for More Definite Statement; Denying without prejudice 54 Motion to Dismiss Party, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 3/26/2012.(ervsl, )
October 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Granting Service by the United States Marshal re: 1 Complaint filed by Terence J. Hankins by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/20/2011. (ervsl, )
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/18/2011. (sah2, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hankins v. Husband et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terence J. Hankins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John (I) E. Husband
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Husband
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Axis Steel, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?