Avaya, Inc. v. United Pacific (USA) Corp.
Plaintiff: Avaya, Inc.
Defendant: United Pacific (USA) Corp.
Case Number: 1:2011cv02327
Filed: September 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Presiding Judge: William J. Martinez
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting 50 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Reopen Case, Vacating Paragraph 23 of Order Granting Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for Seizure of Counterfeit Goods, and Re-Closing Case. This matter is REOPENED for the sole and limited purpose of addressing Paragraph 23 of this Courts September 9, 2011 Order ECF No. 16 . Paragraph 23 of said Order is hereby VACATED. Plaintiff Avaya, Inc. is hereby relieved of its obligation to maintain the seized counterfeit Avaya products underlying this case, and, as this matter is now concluded, Avaya may destroy those counterfeit products. This case shall return to its prior status of being DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/11/2013.(ervsl, )
July 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER granting 48 Stipulated Motion for Release of Bond and Dismissal of Case. The 17 bond posted in connection with this matter by Plaintiff Avaya, Inc. is released. The 16 bond requirement previously ordered in this case is vacated. The above-captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice. Each side shall bear its own costs, attorney's fees, and expert witness fees. By Judge William J. Martinez on 7/16/12.(mnfsl, )
June 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MINUTE ORDER granting 44 the Joint Status Report and Stipulated Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference set for 6/12/2012 is vacated. Status Report regarding the status of the settlement agreement due by 7/2/2012, if the parties have not filed dismissal papers by that date. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/6/2012. (mehcd)
October 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER The Stipulations ( 28 Response to Order to Show Cause, 33 Stipulation and 20 Stipulation) are approved. The 10/31/11 Show Cause Hearing is vacated. The Seizure Order is amended. The Stipulated Superseding Preliminary Injunction is entered. The case is unsealed. The complaint and the Ex Parte Applicaiton are to remain sealed throughout the pendency of this action. All other documents are unsealed, by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/28/11. (gmssl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Avaya, Inc. v. United Pacific (USA) Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Avaya, Inc.
Represented By: Robert Thomas Egan
Represented By: Christine Simpson Baxter
Represented By: Kellie Nelson Fetter
Represented By: James Michael Graziano
Represented By: Christian Heath Hendrickson
Represented By: Kelly K. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Pacific (USA) Corp.
Represented By: Edward Allen Gleason
Represented By: Jesus Manuel Vazquez, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?