McConnell v. Cirbo et al
| Frankie L. McConnell |
| K. O'Brien, Andrea Cirbo and Debra Reilly |
| 1:2011cv02342 |
| September 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Pueblo |
| William J. Martinez |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER The Magistrate Judges Recommendation ECF No. 47 is ADOPTED in its entirety; Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 42 is GRANTED; Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant. Each party shall bear her own costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/29/2013.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER adopting the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court ORDERS as follows: Plaintiff's Objections 37 to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 35 are OVERRULED and the Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 24 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs first and third claims is GRANTED, and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plainti ff's second claim against Defendant Reilly in her individual capacity is DENIED; Plaintiff's claims against Defendants in their official capacities seeking monetary damages are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and Defendant Andra Cirbo is DISMISSED as a party-Defendant in this action, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/20/12.(lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER ACCEPTED 22 Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mixs January 25, 2012 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs claims against K. OBrien are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. The Clerk shall AMEND the caption to reflect that Defendant K. OBrien has been terminated; and 4. All future filings should omit K. OBrien as a Defendant, by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/16/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for appointment of counsel is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs 26 request for clarification is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for an extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file objections, if any, to the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 22 no later than February 21, 2012, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/7/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/21/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/11/11. (lyg, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 9/13/11. (lsw, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER to Transfer Documents to New Action. ORDERED that the clerk of the Court is directed to use the Prisoner Complaints 20 21 and the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 19 to open a new and separate case. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the Court is directed to file a copy of this order in both this case and in the new case the clerk opens. FURTHER ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 filed in this action 19 is denied as moot, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/6/11. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
