Lopez v. Prince et al
Gerardo Lopez |
Michael (I) Prince, Michael Prince, Elizabeth (I) Boggess and Elizabeth Boggess |
1:2011cv02352 |
September 7, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Christine M. Arguello |
Boyd N. Boland |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER granting 36 Motion to Dismiss, granting 32 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, dismissing 31 Amended Complaint, and awarding defendants their costs by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 8/9/12.(dkals, ) |
Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER: granting 38 Defendant Boggess Unopposed Motion to Vacate the Scheduling Conference and to Stay Discovery.Discovery is STAYED. Scheduling Conference set for February 29, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. is VACATED. The parties shall file a status report within ten days of any ruling on the pending motions to dismiss addressing the status of the case and the pretrial matters, if any, to be scheduled, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/24/12.(bnbcd, ) |
Filing 28 MINUTE ORDER: granting 23 Plaintiff Gerardo Lopezs Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, and for Acceptance of Contemporaneously-Filed Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/20/11.(bnbcd, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 12/1/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/23/11. (bnbcd, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.