Chevron Corporation v. Salazar
Chevron Corporation |
Maria Aguinda Salazar |
Douglas Beltman |
1:2011cv02426 |
September 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Michael E. Hegarty |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/1/2014. (klyon, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER for Status Report. By May 7, 2014, the movant, Douglas Beltman, SHALL FILE a status report. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/23/2014. (klyon, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER. The Amended Motion for Protective Order filed by Non-Party Douglas Beltman 4 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and grant Mr. Beltman leave to re-file consistent with any action taken concerning the underlying litigation. Any delay in re-filing the motion caused by the Second Circuits stay of the underlying litigation will not affect the Courts consideration of timeliness pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c)(3). By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/29/2011.(sah, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER. In light of the filing of the Amended Motion for Protective Order filed by Non-Party Douglas Beltman 4 , the initial Motion for Protective Order filed by Non-Party Douglas Beltman 1 is denied as moot. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/19/2011.(sah, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.