Burton v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, The et al
| Alex Burton |
| Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, The, Law Office of Castle Stawiarski, LLC, Debra (I) Johnson and Debra Johnson |
| 1:2011cv02522 |
| September 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER ACCEPTING 93 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION. The 90 Post-Settlement Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice is granted. Plaintiff's claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/29/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
83
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot the following motions: 11 Defendant Castle Stawiarski, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 12(b)(1) and (6), 37 Defendant Denver Public Trustee's Motion to Dismiss, and 76 Defendant Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co.'s Motion to Dismiss. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/10/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
80
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 50 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/1/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 32 Defendant Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company's Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/19/2012. (mehcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
