Stringer et al v. USA
| Kevin Stringer, Ryan O'Neill, Joaquin Martinez, Christopher Anderson and William Leger, III |
| USA |
| 1:2011cv02584 |
| October 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Insurance |
| 38 U.S.C. ยง 1965 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER Vacating 111 Order to Show Cause re 112 Notice, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/15/2014. (jsmit)
|
|
Filing
108
JUDGMENT by Clerk re 107 : Judgment is entered in the amount of $25,000 in favor of Plaintiff Ryan O'Neill for his attorney's fees in this action; Judgment is entered in the amount of $5,000 in favor of Plaintiff Kevin Stringe r for his attorney's fees in this action; Judgment is entered in the amount of $5,000 in favor of Plaintiff Joaquin Martinez for his attorney's fees in this action; Judgment is entered in the amount of $5,000 in favor of Plaintiff Christopher Anderson for his attorney's fees in this action, and Judgment is entered in the amount of $5,000 in favor of Plaintiff William Leger, III for his attorney's fees in this action, by Clerk on 7/17/2014. (jsmit)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER FOR REMAND: the administrative decisions denying TSGLI benefits for Plaintiffs Kevin Stringer, Joaquin Martinez, Christopher Anderson, and William Leger III are vacated and these matters are remanded to the United States Army for further consi deration, in light of the guidance provided by this Court's order dated December 13, 2013. this order for remand does not affect the motion for attorney's fees filed by Plaintiff Ryan ONeill on January 13, 2014 (#92). The Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff Ryan ONeill's motion for attorney's fees on or before March 7, 2014, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/22/2014. (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
89
JUDGMENT by Clerk re 88 Order: the decision denying Ryan O'Neill's application for benefits under TSGLI is vacated and this matter is remanded to the United States Army, by Deputy Clerk on 12/13/2013. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
82
Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 10/30/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Ryan ONeill 74 , is denied and a written order will be prepared and entered. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
73
Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 6/17/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Attorney William Muhr's Motion to Withdraw 35 in 11-cv-02550-RPM, is granted. Mr. Muhr and his law firm have no further representation respon sibility. Mr. Amirinoor shall retrieve a copy of his file at Mr. Muhr's office. Mr. Muhr shall obtain a copy from Mr. Rector of Mr. Amirinoor's file and turn it over directly to plaintiff Amirinoor. Mr. Amirinoor shall find new counsel and advise the Court by the filing of an entry of appearance. Motion to Stay Proceedings 71 in 11-cv-02584-RPM, is granted with respect to all related cases with the exception of plaintiff ONeill. Defendant in 11-cv-02584-RPM shall file its motion for summary judgment with respect to plaintiff ONeill by July 17, 2013 and plaintiff's response due in accordance with the rules.FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER APPROVING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 63 : (see Order for deadlines) Motions for summary judgment due by 6/3/2013, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/29/2013. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
61
Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 2/15/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification 51 , is deferred. Court and counsel agree that both sides will each select one Colorado resident plaintiff to serve as test cases. Mr. Risner will file applicable Administrative records and plaintiffs counsel may file a motion for leave to supplement the records if necessary.FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER FOR HEARING CONCERNING KEVIN STRINGER re: 44 and 48 : a hearing will be held at a time to be scheduled and Kevin Stringer, William Muhr, L. Daniel Rector and Kimberly Alford Everette are required to be present at the hearing at which the Court will determine the status of Kevin Stringer as a plaintiff in this civil action and his legal representation, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/27/2012. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER Setting Conference for 5/18/2012 at 10:00 AM in Conference Room to enable the development of a coordinated case management order, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/24/2012. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER VACATING ORDERS re: 30 , 24 , 27 , 17 , 13 , 12 9 and 2 . Order of reference to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer is vacated and the orders previously entered by Magistrate Judge Shaffer are vacated, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/23/2012. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 12/19/2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 10/20/11. (cbssec)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/6/11. (mskcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
