PRIDE Services, Inc. v. City and County of Denver et al
| PRIDE Services, Inc. |
| City and County of Denver, Calvin Black and Calvin (I) Black |
| 1:2011cv02596 |
| October 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Larimer |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS: The Defendants' Motions to Dismiss ( 13 , 15 ) are GRANTED, and the claims in the Complaint are DISMISSED. As set forth, within 21 days, Pride may file an Amended Complaint that adequately pleads any claims it may have arising out of the alleged giving of adverse references. If no such Amended Complaint is filed within the 21-day period, the Clerk shall close this case. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/21/12.(msksec, )
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTE ORDER. ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate 34 is GRANTED. All future deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order are VACATED and will be reset, if appropriate. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/23/12.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Stay. Discovery related to Plaintiff's claims seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from the City Defendant may proceed pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All discov ery related to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Black in his individual capacity for monetary damages is STAYED pending resolution of his 15 Motion to Dismiss. All discovery related to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Black in hi s official capacity is STAYED pending resolution of his 15 Motion to Dismiss. All discovery is stayed pending resolution of the 13 , 15 Motions to Dismiss with the exception of discovery related to Plaintiff's claims seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the City Defendant and discovery related to Plaintiff's claims against the One or More John Does referenced in the Complaint. Discovery regarding the John Does may be obtained from the City Defendant only, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 03/05/2012.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
30
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/30/12. (msksec, )
|
|
Filing
23
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 19 Plaintiff's Unopposed Plaintiff's Motion to Appear by Telephone During Scheduling Conference and Certification of Compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.1(A); granting 20 Plaintiff's Unopposed Plaintiff& #039;s Motion to Appear by Telephone During Scheduling Conference and Certification of Compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.1(A). Plaintiff's counsel may appear by telephone at the Scheduling Conference on 01/26/2012 at 9:30 AM by dialing the Court, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 01/19/2012.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/6/11. (mskcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
