Reyes v. Snowcap Creamery, Inc. et al
| Jonathan Reyes |
| Snowcap Creamery, Inc., Emily Arnold and Robert Arnold |
| Robert Arnold, Emily Arnold and Snowcap Creamery, Inc. |
| Jonathan Reyes |
| 1:2011cv02755 |
| October 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Boulder |
| William J. Martinez |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0216 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER granting 122 Motion to Withdraw. IT IS ORDERED that Joel C. Maguire and Dietze and Davis, P.C. are permitted to withdraw as counsel for Defendants, by Judge John L. Kane on 10/16/2014. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
120
AMENDED JUGDMENT. ORDERED that Judgment enter in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Snowcap Creamery, Inc. for $392.86 on the Third Claim. The Judgment for $392.86 has been satisfied. ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded is awarded � 36;36,111.53 in attorney fees under the FLSA and $1,901.09 in costs under the FLSA and Rule 54(d)(1), and that Judgment enter in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants for $38,012.62. ORDERED that post-judgment interest on the Judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff shall accrue at the legal rate of.13% per annum by Judge John L. Kane on 06/04/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER re: 110 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the foregoing reasons, Mr. Reyes is awarded $36,111.53 in attorney fees and $1,901.09 in costs by Judge John L. Kane on 06/02/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER denying 104 Motion for New Trial and Discussing Other Post-Trial Issues by Judge John L. Kane on 03/20/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
100
Stipulation and ORDER Governing The Custody And Disposition Of Trial Exhibits, Transcripts, And Papers by Judge John L. Kane on 12/20/2013. (babia)
|
|
Filing
71
AMENDED ORDER re: 70 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, This case remains set for a three-day bench trial beginning December 16, 2013, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/14/2013. (ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER re: 28 OBJECTION/Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Reyes. The deadline for completion of discovery of September 21, 2012 and the deadline for filing dispositive motions of October 22, 2012 are hereby VACATED . Further, the Final Pretrial Conference set for December 18, 2012 is also VACATED. The parties are to file a status report within five days of the ruling by the District Court on Plaintiffs Objections [Doc. No. 28] addressing the need for further discovery and scheduling based on the outcome of the District Courts ruling. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 09/19/12. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
27
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motion Hearing held on 8/8/2012, granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Compel. Discovery, for purposes of compliance with the issues discussed during this hearing only, due by 9/21/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 10/22/2012. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/18/2012 09:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. FTR: Courtroom C-201. (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
14
SECOND ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 2/2/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/5/2011. (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 1/12/2012 09:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/26/2011. (kmtcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
