Quitman v. Pinnacol Assurance et al
Samantha Quitman |
Pinnacol Assurance and Pinnacol Foundation |
1:2011cv02783 |
October 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Adams |
Lewis T. Babcock |
Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER: Pursuant to the 28 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice, this matter shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own fees and costs, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/17/2013. (eseam) |
Filing 25 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 12/12/2012. The court GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART 22 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. The court shall grant the motion to the exten d that it seeks to extend the discovery cut off date to January 4, 2013. The court shall deny the motion to the extent that it seeks to extend the dispositive motion deadline. The current dispositive motion deadline of January 7, 2013 shall remain. The parties are advised that the court is not willing to grant any further extensions. FTR: Robin Mason. (cbscd, ) |
Filing 14 PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 5/25/12. (cbssec) |
Filing 5 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND STANDING ORDER FOR ANY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 5/1/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom C401 before Judge Lewis T. Babcock, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/23/2012. (eseam) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.