EMS USA, Inc. v. Integrity Services LLC et al
| EMS USA, Inc. |
| Thomas R. Ripper and Integrity Services LLC |
| 1:2011cv02832 |
| October 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER AND STIPULATED JUDGMENT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION granting 38 Motion for Judgment, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/21/11.(jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
28
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/28/11. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
17
PROTECTIVE ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/15/11. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 12/20/2011 03:00 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/9/11. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
9
STIPULATED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER FOR LIMITED EXPEDITED DISCOVERY re: 8 Joint Motion for Order Vacating Preliminary Injunction Hearing, for Entry of Stipulated Temporary Restraining Order and Order for Limited Expedited Discovery and 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The preliminary injunction hearing set for 11/3/2011 at 9:00 AM is hereby vacated. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/3/11.(mnfsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
