Hassan v. State of Colorado, The et al
Abdul Karim Hassan |
State of Colorado, The and Scott Gessler |
1:2011cv03116 |
November 30, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
William J. Martinez |
Michael J. Watanabe |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/3/12.(pabcd) |
Filing 30 ORDER Upon receipt of the Parties' 38 joint motion to file stipulated facts for the Court's use in deciding the motion to dismiss, which has now been converted into a motion for summary judgment, and being fully advised in the premises , the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. The stipulated facts submitted by the parties are deemed admitted for the purposes of deciding the motion for summary judgment in favor of either party, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/30/2012.(ervsl, ) |
Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER: DENYING 17 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Participate by Telephone. Plaintiff shall be present in person at the Scheduling Conference 2/21/2012 10:30 AM MST, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/14/2012.(mjwcd) |
Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 2/21/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/15/2011. (ervsl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.