TopSchool, Inc. v. Education Online Services Corporation, Inc.
| TopSchool, Inc. |
| Education Online Services Corporation, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv03124 |
| December 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
JUDGMENT by Clerk re 58 : judgment is entered for the Plaintiff Topschool, Inc., and against the defendants Education Online Services Corporation, Inc., and Ezell Brown, jointly and severally, in the amount of $353,009.28, plus post-judgment interest at 0.11% as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1961, by Clerk on 11/6/2013. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Granting 55 Motion to Vacate Trial and to Stay Case to Effectuate Settlement, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/5/2013.(rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Setting Pretrial Conference for 8/2/2013 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4:00 p.m. 7/25/2013 delivered in paper form directly to chambers, lead counsel present in person and no parties permitted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/21/2013. (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Granting 47 Joint Motion to Enter a Supplemental 11 Scheduling Order: Discovery due by 3/30/2013 and Dispositive Motions due by 4/30/2013 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) Deadline: February 28, 2013 and Contradicting Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2): March 14, 2013, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/7/2013. (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
44
Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 10/11/2012 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 33 , is denied. Counsel to confer to develop and submit a proposed supplemental scheduling order. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER TO COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 as to any information to be submitted under restriction based on the re: 24 Protective Order, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/18/2012. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
19
MINUTE ORDER denying 16 Motion for Leave of Court for Representative Ezell Brown to Attend Settlement Conference by Phone. Parties shall appear in person for the settlement conference 5/8/2012 01:30 PM, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/19/2012.(mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 2/28/2012 at 03:00 PM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on February 23, 2012, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/20/2012. (rpmcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TopSchool, Inc. v. Education Online Services Corporation, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TopSchool, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Dean Macy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Education Online Services Corporation, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Marc Howard Schtul |
| Represented By: | Joseph G. Webb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
