Dowling v. Xcel Energy
Plaintiff: Theresa L. Dowling
Defendant: Xcel Energy
Case Number: 1:2011cv03173
Filed: December 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 61 JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Xcel Energy against Theresa L. Dowling re: 60 Order Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's claims against defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE the defendant is AWARDED its costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. By Clerk on 12/13/12. (kfinn, )
December 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER ADOPTING 56 RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's claims against defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendant Xcel Energy against plaintiff Theresa L. Dowling on all claims. Defendant is AWARDED its costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/4/12. (kfinn, )
October 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER re: Defendant's oral motion for attorney's fees and costs associated with Plaintiff's failure to appear at deposition and 55 Defendant's Notice of Statement of Fees. Plaintiff shall pay costs and attorney's fees to Defendant in the amount of $724.00 on or before 11/2/2012. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/15/2012. (mehcd)
September 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MINUTE ORDER granting 49 Motion for Leave to Notice Plaintiff Theresa Dowling's Deposition at the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse on September 25, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. Defendant may notice the videotaped deposition of Plaintiffat the Alfred A. Arraj Courthouse on September 25, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/11/12.(mjgsl, )
May 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MINUTE ORDER denying 40 Motion to Enforce, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/7/12.(mjgsl, )
May 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/2/2012. (mehcd)
April 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 29 Plaintiff's Motion to Join Parties, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/17/2012. (mehcd)
December 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER of Recusal. Clerk's Office to randomly drawn and assign another Magistrate Jduge, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/30/11. (gmssl, )
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ASSIGNING CASE. This case shall be assigned to District Judge Robert E. Blackburn, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1C.1., and to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/14/2011. (sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dowling v. Xcel Energy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xcel Energy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theresa L. Dowling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?