Korbelik v. Kit Carson County, Board of County Commissioners et al
| Tonya Korbelik |
| Robert Furrow, William Korbelik, Kit Carson County, Board of County Commissioners and Tom Ridnour |
| 1:2011cv03240 |
| December 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Kit Carson |
| Lewis T. Babcock |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 38 Plaintiff Isenbart's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/24/2013. (eseam)
|
|
Filing
37
JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 36 Order on 9/28/12. (lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER. The Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Sheriff Tom Ridnour, Undersheriff Robert Furrow, and Defendant Board of County Commissioners of Kit Carson County 19 21 22 are granted, and Plaintiffs federal claim for Violation of Substantive Due Process is dismissed with prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant William Korbelik 20 is granted, and Plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed without prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/25/12.(lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Caption 29 is GRANTED. The caption in this matter shall reflect the name of the Plaintiff as Tonya Isenbart and the Court will accept Plaintiffs filings under the name of Tonya Isenbart. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/8/2012.(sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
